Thread:CSaPForumWall ~ Staff Discussions/@comment-33067344-20180831044214/@comment-33162239-20180901233917

"If you provide reasoning on why the mindhax fucks over your oponent, it should be fine. Read Arceus' response."

That's not what the Superpower fallacy is used for. If you do an elaborate response of how Character A beats Character B with this hax, that's A-ok. But if you say "Lel this character mindfucks cuz the other one doesn't :V" is a huge no-no

"Now, your example is highly flawed, and unlikely to happen. There is substantiation to refute."

One, I know it's unlikely to happen, but saying it's never going to happen due to it's unlikelyness is fallacious. Also, Guy A never gave why that certain character mindhaxxes.