Thread:CSaPForumWall ~ Staff Discussions/@comment-33067344-20180831044214/@comment-32286613-20180831184713

Wither is basically saying that he doesn't want such short-term expalantions. He wants elaborations.

If i have to be entirely honest, i agree almost entirely with Seb though. I DO think that simply saying "win cause Mind Control" isn't good enough (an elaboration about how the power works and stuff would be appreciated), but technically "win cause Mind Control" is somewhat of a good example. I mean, if the character with mind control faces a guy who is completely haxless (thus has no way to prevent Mind Control, or to just use some of his/her hax to counter that almost-win guarantee), then "win cause Mind Control", is already fine honestly. Basically, i'm fine with such easy wins, but only in determinated circumstances. However, when the character wins 100% because of Mind Control (against an haxed character), i'd prefer to see an elaboration on how the character's Mind Control works, and also a further explanation about why he'll be able to counter the other guy's most powerful abilities (assuming the opponent has OP skills like Existence Erasure) and prevent him from using them first (i mean, technically, at the beginning of a fight, if both are bloodlusted and if speed is equalized, then the other could try to mind control and at the same time the other can erase him/her from existence)

This is all i have to say, really. Just wanted to give my opinion, and frankly i'm fine with either choice no matter what, i'll just see how this goes.