Thread:Paleomario66/@comment-26374068-20171125090940/@comment-26374068-20171202222107

Paleomario66 wrote: So even if removing Title 2 doesn't have much of an effect on the internet, he might not be able to do it in the first place? Paleo, I hate to say it, but this is a lot larger than what you think.

Having "not much of an effect on the internet" is an extreme understatement. In the long term, as the statistics show, this will plummet the market, throttling and discrimination will be legal, and freedom of speech on the internet as a whole won't be a thing anymore. Not to mention that they can throttle and block sites people use for schooling should it not benefit the ISP, redirection will be legal, and it's likely that crime rates and suicides will increase as a result, because there are people who live on videogames and the internet.

Furthermore, we'll all be brainless zombies because we can't access information freely anymore and will thus go back to being misled by the news and the government.

Before 2015, a lot of people were without internet, and were blocked and throttled. This got so bad that it ended up in federal court, after all. I honestly think you're undermining this entire situation.

But outside of that, I get my information from the internet. YouTube, article updates, and such. Another example of how this is big: I won't be able to do that when Title 2 goes away.