User blog comment:Paleomario66/Mario's Higher-End feats: Outliers or not?/@comment-33067344-20180809224134/@comment-33067344-20180831190003

>"This is the kind of thing i was talking about. It may be needless, but if you fail to understand the nature that lies behind what i was trying to say, your point is also needless. It may be true that i did commit a fallacy since you weren't talking about Power Stars nor Green Stars, but the intent was not "debunking" (since again, you never talked about Power Stars or Green Stars), the intent was simply talking about it even if it's out of context, just to give my point of view. Your Red Herring is completely useless in this scenario, i can say whatever i want in a debate as long as i don't offend the others, thus i can freely explain things just to give further points. You literally just created a debate out of nothing because you claim you never mentioned those (which is true), yet however the claim itself wasn't directed to that, but it was just a further explanation to show Mario's feats that doesn't need to be argued as it is just an additional piece of proof that wasn't involved in the debate at all that, again, was nothing more than "something more to add".

You're misleading the main subject of the argument by bringing up a topic that hasn't been discussed at all, Arceus. Read this if you don't even know what a Red Herring is.

Yes, the premise of the Green Stars being comparable to Power Stars is a subjective premise. Won't bother with this argument again.