User blog comment:Paleomario66/Mario's Higher-End feats: Outliers or not?/@comment-33067344-20180809224134/@comment-33067344-20180811174102

>"In most of those times (especially in SMB and NSMB DS), Mario can also defeat Bowser with fireballs, so he didn't need to outsmart base Bowser in order to win."

Either outsmarted, or defeated by Powerups. None of them support your argument.

>" Also, in Super Mario RPG, Mario stomped Bowser. Mario did attack the chain, but Bowser's attacks do very little damage to Mario, so there's no reason to say attacking the chain was Mario's only way to win."

>Bowser outright laughs at Mario's attacks, to the point of which they do nothing to Bowser.

>"Mario stomped bowser"

I'm sorry, but what? The only way to win the battle is by attacking the chain.''

>"I'd hardly call that an outlier since Bowser and Mario fought Dimentio, who surpassed the Void, which was going to destroy not only the Dream Depot, but all of existence. As shown above, everything made up of color is made up of some amount of black paint, including dreams, which makes the Dream Depot possible."

The fact they used amps for lower feats makes it an outlier by default.

>"How does it not debunk your argument? I don't even see how your initial argument refutes mine."

As I said, botomless =/= infinite. You can say something is botomless; it's not a direct statement—and it's an hyperbole'y word; so saying something is infinite because it is stated to be botomless is a blatant Figure of Speech fallacy.