Thread:CSaPForumWall ~ Staff Discussions/@comment-33067344-20180831044214/@comment-33067344-20180901125155

>"Simply because we're a site with a similar debating system to VS Battles doesn't mean we have to copy every single rule and guideline within their book of policies. We don't have to allow everything they allow."

Very nice Red Herring, Wither. Nobody brought up how we're similar to VSBW; you're derailing the argument with something that was never stated.

>"Yes, it technically is debating. But not very good debating. You base a character's victory on solely their ability to delete or mindcontrol. Then everyone agrees and calls it a day; boom, thread closed, effortless and quick victory based on just one thing they can do. No other factors present."

Read Arceus' response. He covers this rather nicely.

>"I do not want matches like these on this wiki, nor do others except for possibly Arceus. As I said; we don't have to use the exact same stuff VS Battles is built on. Most people on this thread oppose so far. This type of debating is not even remotely fun or, at least in my perspective, constructive or actually well thought-out, nor actually strong enough to convince others."

Wither, Are you even reading our arguments? Yes, Mind Control is a way of deciding matches. Read Arceus' response once again.

>"Probably gonna end up closing this if the consensus doesn't change. The thread isn't going anywhere, but most of the posters have expressed themselves to oppose this. I'll give it one more day."

Golden Mean Fallacy. Their arguments for it are wrong. You have to refute our arguments in order for theirs' to apply. Common debating, Wither.