User blog comment:Muhammedmco/Akame Ga Kill - Some Calcs/@comment-28109341-20190603060033

So many things wrong

A manga panel =/= a frame. A frame only exists in visual, moving mediums like TV shows and movies. All of these timeframes are wack and exaggerated.

Freezing half the world does not mean literally half the planet. You need deeper evidence than that anyway.

If you have already found the amount of joules exerted in one second, then that's that. You cannot multiply by a minute or whatever to get your total energy because a joule is a measure of energy released in one second. A regular human can be uninjured by air molecules, air molecules are not accumulating chip damage against a body every passing second. That's how attack potency works, only energy released in one second counts. You can't multiply watts by the duration of the feat unless there are specific contexts.

Attacking the world and its lands is small star? Don't you think that maybe this is blown way out of porportion and is likely just a testament to range and to a much, much, MUCH lesser extent, AP? With these levels of energy, you aren't even attacking the world at that point, you're causing the apocalypse. If this was an onscreen feat and not what is literally the highest end interpretation possible, okay, fiction can lack realism, but it isn't.

I'm pretty sure a lot of these distances are not even correct or are misinterpreted. I choose not to die on that hill though because it really doesn't matter, all of the above points make this one redundant.

Kinetic energy for a storm because it caused collateral damage? If this was the case in real life, the world would have ended long ago. (With this logic, me saying the world would have ended would be somethng around the ballpark of dwarf star for some arbitrary reason)

In a lot of these cases you can't just add stuff up however you please. That’s not how it works. Either a storm is created by one method or its created by another. You can't just add up speeds because a speed feat is casual or something.

That dude is evidently not 18 kilometers tall, not unless each and every single one of those buildings is multiple kilometers wide. Also, mountains vary in size, so dwarfing mountains does not mean these two dudes compare in size necessarily, especially when every other scale of size actively contradicts this.

The math has no errors, but seriously, context and knowledge are the most important parts of calcs.